Bauserman v. Charlott
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Leavenworth District Court. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the facts. Judgment for plaintiff, Charlott, at the December term, 1889 The defendant, Bauserman, as administrator of the estate of James G. Blunt, deceased, brings the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
*481The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hokton, C. J.:
On the. 15th day of December, 1874, C. S.. Charlott recovered a judgment against Joseph Pulitzer and Gen. James G. Blunt, in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, in the state of Missouri, for $1,023.72. General Blunt died on the 25th of July, 1881. On the 14th day of December, 1885, J. P. Bauserman was appointed administrator of his estate by the probate court of Leavenworth county. On' the 14th day of December, 1888, C. S. Charlott brought his action in the district court of Leavenworth county against J. P. Bauserman, as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Amy v. WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Tynan v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Burlingame TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Taylor v. MilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Sibert v. WilderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Dennis v. BintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Glazier Ex Rel. Estate of Glazier v. HeneybussSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Kulp v. KulpSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Rochester American Insurance v. Cassell Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Brown v. BaxterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.