State v. Gerlack
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm. ORS 116.250((l)(b). He assigns as error that the court denied his motions for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.
Defendant concedes that the state proved that he carried a firearm concealed upon his person. The issue is whether the state also had the burden to prove that defendant did not have a license to carry that firearm. ORS 166.250(1) (b) provides:
“(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, ORS 166.260, 166.270, 166.280, 166.290 or 166.410 to 166.470, a person commits the crime of unlawful possession of a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. McIntireCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. EngemanOregon Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Vasquez-RubioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. AnfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. BrustCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. SepelakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
- State v. AnfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.