Legal Opinion

State v. Gerlack

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 1987No. DA302966; CA A41354PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm. ORS 116.250((l)(b). He assigns as error that the court denied his motions for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.

Defendant concedes that the state proved that he carried a firearm concealed upon his person. The issue is whether the state also had the burden to prove that defendant did not have a license to carry that firearm. ORS 166.250(1) (b) provides:

“(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, ORS 166.260, 166.270, 166.280, 166.290 or 166.410 to 166.470, a person commits the crime of unlawful possession of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State v. McIntireCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. State v. EngemanOregon Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Vasquez-RubioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. State v. AnfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. BrustCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. SepelakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  5. State v. AnfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API