Legal Opinion

State v. Anfield

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 14, 1990No. 87-08-34634; CA A50077PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*694NEWMAN, J.

Defendant appeals two convictions for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992.1 He assigns as error that the court denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained from him. We affirm.

At the suppression hearing, the court either found or could have found these facts. On June 8, 1987, at about 3:00 a.m., Officer Justus responded to a report of an accident in which a car had hit a tree. When he arrived at the scene, he saw another officer conversing with defendant. Defendant claimed that a friend had been driving the car but had left. Defendant was standing at the rear of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AnfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. SepelakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  4. State v. AnfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. AnfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API