Legal Opinion
Harris v. City of Kansas City, Kan.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 9, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-2507-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFPELS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. This case arises out of the arrest of plaintiffs by defendants Tim Fowler (“Fowler”), Rick Armstrong (“Armstrong”), and Richard Nelson (“Nelson”), officers of defendant Kansas City, Kansas Police Department. Plaintiffs bring this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 and 1985. They also propound claims under state law for false arrest, assault and battery. Defendants seek summary judgment on all of plaintiffs’ claims. 1
A moving party is entitled to summary judgment only…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bibum v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- A.D. Powers v. MillerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Harris v. City of Kansas CityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989