Legal Opinion

Adams v. Berry-Beall Dry Goods Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 29, 1924No. 13239PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Commissioners’ ■ Opinion, Division No. 3. Error from District Court, Pittsburg County; A. <3. Brewster, Assigned Judge. Action by Berry-Beall Dry Goods Company against E. E. Adams. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

This action was filed in the district court for Pittsburg county by the defendant in error, as plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, for the purchase price of certain merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant in error. For convenience, the parties will be designated herein as they appeared in the court below. At the time of filing its petition, February 26, 1921, setting forth a schedule of the goods sold and delivered, and the sum due thereon, the plaintiff filed its affidavit for garnishment, wherein it is set forth that defendant has not…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Herbert v. WaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Hughes v. KanoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Horne v. Oklahoma State Bank of AtokaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. HerndonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Waldock v. State Ex Rel. FinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Board of Education of Town of Ringling v. State Ex Rel. BentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Burkhart v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API