Legal Opinion
Roe v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 2001No. A093755PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*67Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
John Roe filed a complaint claiming the Office of Real Estate Appraisers violated a confidentiality clause in the stipulation by which an administrative disciplinary action against him was settled. The trial court sustained respondents’ demurrer without leave to amend. Appellant contends the trial court abused its discretion because all his causes of action showed entitlement to relief or could have been amended to do so. We reverse.
Statement of The Case and Facts
On January 6, 2000, appellant filed his first amended complaint for breach of contract, breach of mandatory duty…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- EH Morrill Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Frankel v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- San Mateo Union High School District v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Utility Audit Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Lanigan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Comcast of Sacramento I, LLC v. Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
- County of Santa Clara v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.