Legal Opinion

Stinnett v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New *363York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered December 4, 1992, which, inter alia, granted the nonparty respondent Cascione, Chechanover & Purcigliotti, P. C.’s motion to confirm a report of a Special Referee to the extent of apportioning 10% of a certain disputed legal fee to nonparty appellant A. Charles D’Agostino, unanimously reversed, on the law, the amount of the fee awarded to D’Agostino is $13,830.62, to be paid by the firm of Kelner & Kelner without interest, within 10 days, without costs.

After A. Charles D’Agostino was retained by the plaintiffs to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oberman v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Rodriguez v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Chemprene, Inc. v. X-Tyal International Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Dobbins v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. Barnum v. SrogiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. HOGANWILLIG, PLLC v. HENDEL, KARENAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Sickmen v. Birzon, Szczepanowski & QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Edelstein v. PirrottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. In re New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API