Legal Opinion
Barnum v. Srogi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 11, 1983PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: This appeal is from an order which vacated an attorney’s charging lien filed, pursuant to section 475 of the Judiciary Law, against a portion of the proceeds due under a judgment rendered in this tax certiorari proceeding. Appellant contends that there was a fee-splitting agreement between its firm and T. Crouse Barnum, the attorney of record, which permitted them to share in any contingent fee received as a result of the tax assessment litigation. In its petition, appellant alleges claims which may form the basis for a contractual…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. KeeffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re SebringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- In re the Estate of GutchessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Melzer v. 195 Broadway Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Friedland v. 601 West 149th Street, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rodriguez v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Capoccia v. BrognanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Aiello v. AdarNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- Stinnett v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Greenberg v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.