Legal Opinion
Sickmen v. Birzon, Szczepanowski & Quinn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 23, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kit-son, J.), dated October 20, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the complaint and denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
“It has long been understood that in disputes among attorneys over the enforcement of fee-sharing agreements the courts will not inquire into the precise worth of the services performed by the parties as long as each party actually…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Benjamin v. KoeppelNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Sterling v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Sterling v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Witt v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Gore v. KressnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Graham v. Corona Group HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Reich v. Wolf & Fuhrman, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Edelstein v. PirrottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Wolfe & Yukelson, PLLC v. Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017