Legal Opinion

Mead, Samuel & Co., Inc. v. Dyar

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 18, 1980No. 1 CA-CIV 5031PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment rendered in favor of a landlord in a forcible detainer action commenced in the justice court. It presents the question of whether the justice court acted properly in dismissing the tenant’s counterclaims. If the counterclaims were not properly dismissed, the justice court was without jurisdiction because the total damages prayed for in the action exceeded the statutory jurisdictional amount limitation. We hold that the counterclaims pleaded by appellant were properly dismissed and that, therefore, the justice court had jurisdiction…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. State Ex Rel. Purcell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Olds Bros. Lumber Co. v. RushingArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Webb v. DixonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Hinton v. HotchkissArizona Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pima County v. HeinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Estate of Hernandez v. Bd. of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. BehlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. State Ex Rel. Sol v. BakkerMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. United Effort Plan Trust v. HolmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API