Legal Opinion
Eastman v. Yellow Cab Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 11, 1949No. 9607PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing the complaint before trial. Nine defendants are named, but Yellow Cab Company, Checker Taxi Company, Parmelee Transportation Company, and the city of Chicago and two officials thereof are the principal defendants. The cab and transportation companies will be referred to as “Yellow,” “Checker,” and “Parmelee,” respectively.
The complaint and amendments herein are unduly prolix, covering 41 pages of the printed record. However, referring to matters discussed on this appeal and rearranging them in chronological…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Power Manufacturing Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Edgar Labat and Clifton Alton Poret v. Robert B. Bennett, Acting Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- The People v. WarrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Yellow Cab Company of Nevada, a Nevada Corporation v. Cab Employers, Automotive & Warehousemen, Local 881Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD v. Barwood, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- National Labor Relations Board v. New York State Labor Relations BoardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.