Legal Opinion
United States v. Tello
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 7, 2010No. 08-50579PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-Appellant Carmel A. Tello appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) of using a means of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in a sexual activity for which he can be charged with a criminal offense. The government alleged in the criminal indictment that Tel-lo used the Internet and telephone to knowingly persuade, induce, and entice a minor to engage in sexual activity for which Tello could be charged with a criminal offense under California law. Tello argues on appeal that the evidence at trial showed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Jeffrey MeekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Atel Financial Corp., a California Corporation v. Quaker Coal Company, a Kentucky CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Rakesh DhingraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Wilfredo LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Darensburg v. Metropolitan Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Rodney GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Louis Agront, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.