Legal Opinion
Darensburg v. Metropolitan Transportation Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 16, 2011No. 09-15878PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge SILVERMAN; Concurrence by Judge NOONAN.
OPINION
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-appellants, a class of members of racial minority groups who ride buses operated by the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District (“AC Transit”), a labor union, and a community-based organization appeal from the district court’s judgment in favor of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Claiming state and federal civil rights violations, Plaintiffs allege that MTC’s disproportionate emphasis on rail expansion projects over bus expansion projects in its Regional Transit Expansion Plan, also…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Miriam Mendiola-Martinez v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Greater New Orleans Fair Housing Action Center v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Southwest Fair Housing Council v. MdwidCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Kirola v. City of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- United States v. Maricopa CountyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.