Legal Opinion
United States v. Louis Agront, Sr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 21, 2014No. 13-10218PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
We consider whether a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) regulation prohibiting disorderly conduct that creates loud, boisterous, and unusual noise, see 38 C.F.R. § 1.218(a)(5) and (b)(ll), is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the defendant, Louis Agront, Sr. The regulation, reasonably interpreted, includes a controlling standard of conduct: it prohibits the creation of “loud, boisterous, and unusual noise” that would tend to disturb the normal operation of a VA facility. Applying that interpretation, we hold that the regulation is not vague as applied to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harris v. United States Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Rebecca MorielloCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Thomas KuzmaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. BronsteinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States v. Ramess NakhlehCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.