Legal Opinion

United States v. Overton

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 14, 2009No. 08-30075PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Opinion filed on June 18, 2009, is AMENDED as follows:

The term “natural” appearing in the second paragraph of Section I of the slip opinion appearing at page 7282, is DELETED and REPLACED with the term “biological.”

The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed to issue the mandate in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 41.

OPINION

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

Following a two-day bench trial before the Honorable Donald W. Molloy in the District of Montana, Walter Merle Overton was convicted on two counts of sexual exploitation of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. BlinkinsopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. RessamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API