Wilhelm v. Beyersdorf
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.
— In granting partial summary judgment on an easement dispute, the trial court reformed the road *839easement description to conform to the road’s actual use. Steven and Sarah Beyersdorf, owners of the servient estate, appeal, contending the dominant estate owners are not entitled to reformation. They also argue that they were bona fide purchasers and that equity supports leaving the easement in its current configuration. One of the dominant estate owners, Claudia Dorsey Wilhelm, contends on cross-appeal that the trial court erred in denying her damages and in failing to require the Beyersdorfs…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
- McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Miebach v. ColasurdoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mendez v. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Mark Hanna, et ux v. Allan Margitan, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- James And Holly Kave, V Mcintosh Ridge Primary Road AssocCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- 810 Properties v. JumpCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- GLEPCO, LLC v. ReinstraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.