Legal Opinion

810 Properties v. Jump

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 13, 2007No. 24036-3-IIIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schultheis, A.C. J.

¶1 This case involves a dispute over a roadway that runs through Janeice Jump’s property. In 1999, Ms. Jump blocked access to this roadway at the southern end of her property. The Eatons1 and 810 Properties, who owned property to the south of Ms. Jump, brought this action to establish a right of way easement over the disputed area. The Eatons also asked for damages for lost grazing rights. The trial court concluded that express and prescriptive easements burden Ms. Jump’s property and ordered Ms. Jump to remove the barriers and pay damages to the Eatons for lost grazing…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Landmark Development, Inc. v. City of RoyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Brown v. VossWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mark Hanna, et ux v. Allan Margitan, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. Stuart Mccoll v. Geoffrey AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. Matthew & Amy Johnson v. Lake Cushman Maintenance Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. LITTLEFAIR v. SchulzeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API