Legal Opinion

In Re Heinze

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 1931No. Docket No. 1172PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

It is contended the order of a magistrate holding the petitioner for trial in the superior court upon a charge of attempting to extort money contrary to the provisions of section 524 of the Penal Code is void for failure to have established at the preliminary examination the corpus delicti. It is asserted the record fails to show probable cause to believe the petitioner is guilty of the offense charged.

The petitioner is held by the sheriff of San Joaquin County' pursuant to a commitment duly issued by a justice of the peace of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BawdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. In Re NorthcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Ex parte MoanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. People v. SerranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. In Re RazutisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. In Re StroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. In Re DorseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API