Holt v. Regents of University of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANING, J.
The Regents of the University of California appeal a judgment after jury trial in favor of respondent Loreen J. Holt in her medical malpractice action. Appellant does not challenge the jury’s findings on liability or damages, but contends the judgment violates the provisions of the California Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act of 1975 (MICRA) governing periodic payments of future damages (Code Civ. Proc., 2 § 667.7) and attorney fees (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6146).
Background
Since appellant’s claims of error all concern the manner in which the court apportioned damages, a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Suk Yong Kim v. Sumitomo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Alphonso Jones, Debtor, Robert M. Wood, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- In Re the Marriage of DuBois v. DuBoisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Roa v. Lodi Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Deocampo v. AhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Lewis v. Ukran, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Garhart Ex Rel. Tinsman v. COLUM./HEALTHONE, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hughes v. Pham CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Lewis v. UkranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.