Curry v. Dawson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Associate Justice.
This is a petition for a writ of prohibition. The petitioners are the defendants in a taxpayers’ suit now pending before the respondent Chancellor. The taxpayers’■ action was instituted by James 0. Young, and numerous other plaintiffs, to restrain and enjoin the defendants [petitioners], Bay Curry and other county officials, from the imposition and collection of a tax based upon a county election in which the voters in two townships had no opportunity to vote. The respondent overruled defendants’ demurrer to the complaint, refused to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Walls v. BrundidgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Phillips v. RothrockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Rich v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Arkansas-Missouri Power Corp. v. City of RectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Faver v. GoldenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State ex rel. Robinson v. Craighead County Board of Election CommissionersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Foster v. Jefferson County Quorum CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Files v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Burgess v. Four States Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Dale v. Greater Anchorage Area BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.