Legal Opinion

Curry v. Dawson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 1, 1964No. 5-3340PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Associate Justice.

This is a petition for a writ of prohibition. The petitioners are the defendants in a taxpayers’ suit now pending before the respondent Chancellor. The taxpayers’■ action was instituted by James 0. Young, and numerous other plaintiffs, to restrain and enjoin the defendants [petitioners], Bay Curry and other county officials, from the imposition and collection of a tax based upon a county election in which the voters in two townships had no opportunity to vote. The respondent overruled defendants’ demurrer to the complaint, refused to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Walls v. BrundidgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. Phillips v. RothrockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. Rich v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Arkansas-Missouri Power Corp. v. City of RectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  5. Faver v. GoldenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Robinson v. Craighead County Board of Election CommissionersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Foster v. Jefferson County Quorum CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Files v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Burgess v. Four States Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. Dale v. Greater Anchorage Area BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API