Legal Opinion
Binns v. Adams
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 15, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error from Chautauqua District Court. Action by Binns against Adams and another. Plaintiff brings here for review a judgment in favor of defendants. A sufficient statement of the case is contained in the opinion herein, filed January 5, 1895.
1Per curiam
The only errors complained of in the petition in error relate to matters on the trial for which a new trial was prayed for. The action of the trial court in overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned for error; therefore no question is properly raised in this court for our consideration. (Carson v. Funk, 27 Kas. 524; Clark v. Schnur, 40 id. 72; City of McPherson v. Manning, 43 id. 129.) The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.-
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Carson v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beall v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Coffeyville Gas Co. v. DooleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Bennett v. National Supply Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Perry v. WheelerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901