Legal Opinion

Perry v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1901No. 12,514PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Rice district court; Ansel R. Clark, judge.

1Per curiam

This was an action upon a promissory-note and to foreclose a mortgage securing the same. Judgment was entered against the plaintiffs in error. In order to bring the errors complained of into the record, it was necessary for them to file a motion for a new trial, which they did, but the overruling of the same is not assigned in their petition in error as one of the errors complained of. By this omission all of the errors occurring at the trial are waived. (Binns v. Adams, 54 Kan. 615, 38 Pac. 792.) We may not consider, therefore, any errors except such as would have come to us by a transcript…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Binns v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Friesen v. HiattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API