West v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
In his first assignment of error argued on appeal, petitioner contends the superior court erred in holding that Finding of Fact No. 8 of the Commission’s decision was supported by competent evidence in the record. We disagree.
The Commission’s Finding of Fact No. 8 states:
8. Under the employer’s policy, an employee can be discharged for refusing to participate in the alcohol rehabilitation program when the employer has reason to believe that the employee’s performance is impaired because of alcohol use.
While it is true that respondent employer did not submit any written…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Intercraft Industries Corp. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Yelverton v. Kemp Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Reco Transportation, Inc. v. Employment Security Commission of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Vanhorn v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008