Legal Opinion

Haley v. Greenhaw

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 8, 1962No. 5-2711PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carleton Harris, Chief Justice.

The sole question on this appeal is whether a certain transaction was usurious. The facts leading to the litigation are as follows:

Mrs. Mildred Haley, appellant herein, was granted a divorce from Dr. K. J. Haley on May 23,1959. Prior thereto, the parties had entered into a property settlement which included, inter alia, the provision that the doctor would pay Mrs. Haley $500 in cash and execute a promissory note in her favor in the principal sum of $4,200, payable in monthly installments of $150 per month. The payments were to commence on June 1, 1959, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. Webster v. Sterling Finance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  3. Gibson v. TalleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Mitchell v. DuncanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Carter v. Four Seasons Funding Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Evans v. HambySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Smith v. Sherwood & Roberts, Spokane, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Luebbers v. Money Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Rhine v. HaleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API