Legal Opinion
Smith v. Sherwood & Roberts, Spokane, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1968No. 9798PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McQUADE, Justice.
In this action there are two plaintiffs, the conditional sale purchaser of a used crawler tractor and dozer, and the company owning a garage which repaired the tractor. Defendant is a finance company. The purchaser brought an action against the finance company, assignee of the conditional sale contract, on grounds of usury in the following transactions: the contract itself; a promissory note later made by the purchaser payable to the finance company; and a renewal and extension agreement of the note. The purchaser also asked damages for wrongful repossession of the tractor by…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Hinchman v. Point Defiance Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- Meridian Bowling Lanes, Inc. v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Rothman v. SilverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- D & M DEVELOPMENT CO. v. Sherwood and Roberts, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1969
- C.I.T. Corporation, a New York Corporation v. Lee Pontiac, Inc., Etc., Ralph GorringeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Cecil v. Allied Stores Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
- Boyd v. HeadIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- Torosian v. National Capital Bank of WashingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.