Legal Opinion

Darr v. Burford

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1949No. 3722PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus instituted in the United States Court for Eastern Oklahoma by Pete Darr, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, against C. P. Burford, warden of the state penitentiary at McAIester, Oklahoma. The petition for the writ alleged in substance that two in-formations were filed in the District Court of Lincoln County, Oklahoma, each charging petitioner with the robbery of a bank; that at the time of the filing of the informations, petitioner was serving a term in the state penitentiary; that he did not have funds with which to employ…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. White v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Wade v. MayoSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Baker v. GriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Cornelius Walker, Jr. v. Vernon L. Peppersack, Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  3. Willis v. UtechtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  4. Troy T. Hastings v. H. C. McLeod Warden, Oklahoma State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  5. Díaz Díaz v. Cándida Campos de CórdovaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API