Legal Opinion

United States v. Bolla, Steven

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 24, 2003No. 02-3085PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROBERTS.

ROBERTS, Circuit Judge:

Under the Sentencing Guidelines, punishment for certain economic crimes depends in part on the value of the accompanying loss. Appellant Stephen M. Bolla disputes the district court’s computation of the loss associated with his filing a false Statement of Financial Condition in connection with a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) civil action. Concluding that Bolla lied on his financial statement to evade the maximum penalty possible in the SEC action, the district court found an intended loss of $90,000, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. Carlos Saro, United States of America v. Cornelio Cabrera-BaezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Weaver, WallaceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Keith McGillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Sullivan, RogerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  5. 106 Ltd. v. Commissioner, IRSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API