Legal Opinion

Milici v. Difrancesco

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 1, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.

On June 8th, 1929, the defendants gave to the plaintiff a mortgage upon certain apartment house properties located in New Haven to secure an indebtedness of $30,000 evidenced by their note payable in monthly instalments of not less than $800 each. The note contained a proviso that if any payment of principal or interest should be in arrears for over five days, the unpaid balance would, at the option of the holder, become immediately due and payable. During September of 1931, the plaintiff consented to a modification of the note by permitting the monthly payments to be reduced to $300. In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rokusek v. National Union Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Goodrich v. StanleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  3. Console v. TorchinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  4. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  5. Noyes v. PierceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Halloran v. FischerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Taft v. Valley Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Air-Care N.O. Nelson Co. v. PatchetConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  4. Becker Goldstein v. MacFarlaneConnecticut Superior Court · 1945
  5. Becker & Goldstein v. MacFarlanePennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API