Legal Opinion

Owens v. Magill

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 20, 1992No. 23692PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

Appellant Don Owens (Owens) brought this action individually and as a class action seeking a declaratory judgment to determine the rights of the citizens and taxpayers of greenville County to twenty-six (26) original Andrew Wyeth paintings formerly on display at the Greenville County Art Museum. The trial judge granted summary judgment in favor of respondents, finding that Owens did not have standing to assert this claim. We agree and affirm.

I. FACTS

A brief review of the origin of this action is necessary. In 1979, Arthur Magill purchased the twenty-six Wyeth paintings…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. MARINE CONTRACTING AND TOWING COMPANYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Beasley v. Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  3. First Union Nat'l Bank of SC v. Hitman, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Humana Hospital-Bayside v. LightleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Ex Parte HartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Berry v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  3. City of Columbia v. Town of IrmoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Newman v. RICHLAND CTY. HIST. PRES. COM'NSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. County of Dorchester, South Carolina v. AT&T CorpDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API