Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hart

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 14, 1939No. 14841PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Stabler.

For a statement of the preliminary facts necessary to an understanding of the questions presented by this appeal reference must be had to the opinion in the case of Bx parte Greenville County, a municipal corporation of the State of South Carolina, respondent, In re ex parte W. B. Bowen and Dakyns B. Stover, county attorneys, appellants, S. C., 2 S. E. (2d), 47; filed along with this opinion. As in the foregoing case, this appeal is likewise being prosecuted by the appellants from the order of Judge Rice declaring null and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Northern Trust Co. v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Land, Log & Lumber Co. v. McIntyreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Webster v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Mulberger v. BeurhausWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Shores Lumber Co. v. ClaneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Berry v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  2. State v. PetersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State ex rel. McLeod v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  4. Greenville County v. StoverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  5. Owens v. MagillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API