County of Dorchester, South Carolina v. AT&T Corp
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION County of Dorchester, South Carolina, and) Civil Action No. 2:18-2890-RMG Town of Summerville, South Carolina, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ORDER AND OPINION V. ) ) AT&T Corp. and Bellsouth ) Telecommunications, LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) eo) Before the Court is Defendants’ joint partial motion to dismiss the Complaint and to strike the class allegations. (Dkt. No. 14.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. Background The 911 Act authorizes local governments, such as…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Republican Party of North Carolina v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Stanbury Law Firm, P.A. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Clarence Seay, Jr. v. Tennessee Valley Authority Craven CrowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.