Legal Opinion

First Union Nat'l Bank of SC v. Hitman, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 26, 1992No. 23663PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in First Union National Bank of South Carolina v. Hitman, et al., — S.C. — , 411 S.E. (2d) 681 (Ct. App. 1991). We affirm.

The sole question before us is whether a trial judge commits reversible error by issuing a written order which is in conflict with his prior oral ruling from the bench. We agree with the analysis of the Court of Appeals, and hold that a judge is not bound by the prior oral ruling and may issue a written order which is in conflict with the oral ruling. To the extent McCranie v. Davis, 278 S.C. 513, 299…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCranie v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ford v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control v. Columbia Organic Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Ex Parte ReichlynSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Owens v. MagillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Hilton Head Resort Four Seasons Center Horizontal Property Regime Council of Co-Owners, Inc. v. Resort Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API