Legal Opinion

Hayslett v. Shell Petroleum Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1930No. 11109PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCline, J.

As to the first two conclusions, the court may well adopt the decision of the common pleas court .in this case, without further comment, for it seems to be settled in this state in the case of Kiley vs Hall, 96 Oh St 374, that

“A lot owner cannot maintain an action to enforce by injunction the observance of restrictions contained in the deed of another lot owner where it does not appear that the latter purchased his lot with notice of a general plan for the improvement of' the lots of the allotment in accordance with the restrictions contained in his deed, or with notice that such restrictions…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carranor Woods Property Owners' Ass'n v. DriscollOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Bevy's Dry Cleaners & Shirt Laundry, Inc. v. StrebleOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Winfrey v. MarksOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Grant v. Hickok Oil Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Lennon v. NeilOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API