Legal Opinion

Ewing v. Adams

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1990No. 07-CA-59014PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Max Ewing has appealed a final judgment of the chancery court of Lafayette County that he had waived his lessor's right to restrict the use of his property by the lessees to a drive-in movie business. We address the restrictions of a lease clause "to be used as a drive-in movie theater," and find that, while not restricting the use of the property to that particular purpose, neither does it mean that the lessee has a completely unrestricted right of business use of the property. We also find Ewing did not waive his contractual right under the facts. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

On…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. SklarMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Harry N. And Rose C. Forman v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. NewsomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Dunbar v. Farnum WifeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  5. Matheney v. McClainMississippi Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wiley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Biglane v. Under the Hill Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Titan Indemnity Co. v. HoodMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Dixie Ins. Co. v. MooneyhanMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Scott Addison Const. Inc. v. Lauderdale County School SystemMississippi Supreme Court · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API