Legal Opinion

Folk v. United States

District Court, W.D. South Carolina

Decided February 5, 1952No. Civ. A. Nos. 1170, 1171PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYCHE, Chief Judge.

These two actions are brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b), one for damages for wrongful death, under Sections 411 and 412, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1942, and the other for damages for conscious pain and suffering under Section 419, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1942, and were consolidated and tried together before me without a jury.

In compliance with Rule 52(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., I find the facts specially and state my conclusions of law thereon, in the above causes, as follows:

*737Findings of Fact

Shortly after…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BarnettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  2. Lytle v. Southern Ry. &8212 Carolina DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  3. Rutledge v. SmallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  4. Reynolds v. GriffithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State v. McCallaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Apitz v. DamesOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Brooks v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
  3. United States v. FolkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API