Legal Opinion
Brooks v. United States
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided September 15, 1967No. Civ. A. 66-514PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND OPINION
DONALD RUSSELL, District Judge.
In this action to recover damages both for wrongful death (Section 10-1951 et seq., Code of South Carolina, 1962) and for pain and suffering (Section 10-209, Code of South Carolina, 1962), filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the defendant has conceded that the injuries sustained by the decedent, resulting in the latter’s death, were due to the negligence of the defendant’s authorized agent. The only issues presented involve the right of the plaintiff to recover for decedent’s pain and suffering and the…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Hatahley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Kaczkowski v. BolubaszSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Murphy v. Martin Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Tenore v. Nu Car Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Adams v. DeurSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.