State v. Barnett
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
OxNER, Justice.
Appellant was convicted of involuntary manslaughter. It was alleged in the indictment that the homicide resulted from criminal negligence in the operation of an automobile. The exceptions on this appeal relate' solely to the charge.
It is contended that the Court failed to charge that any doubt as to the guilt or innocence of the accused must be resolved in his favor. The jury was fully instructed that the burden was upon the State to prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt and after .carefully explaining the meaning of this term, the Court said: “Now, do you…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- People v. AngeloNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- State v. GilliamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- People v. CrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- People v. GarmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. GandySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Atchley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1970
- State v. MorfArizona Supreme Court · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.