Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Borderland Con. Co. v. State of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1937No. Criminal No. 843PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The Borderland Construction Company appeals from a judgment of conviction of violating the minimum wage law of the state. The charging part of the information reads:

“The said Borderland Construction Co., a corporation, on or about the 20th day of June, 1935, and before the filing of this information, at and in the County of Pima, State of Arizona, did then and there and while being under contract with the Arizona State Highway Department of the State of Arizona for the construction of project Humber HRS 110-A, known as the Tueson-Ajo Road Project, in the County of Pima, State of Arizona,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. State v. AnklamArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Troutner v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. State v. CutshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. State v. Arizona Mines Supply Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Watson Seafood & Poultry Co. v. George W. Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API