Legal Opinion

State v. Anklam

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1934No. Criminal No. 796PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

—

The defendants, constituting 'the board of supervisors of Pima county, were informed against in the superior court of said county by the county attorney for failure to pay Eoy Jones, a janitor and common laborer performing manual labor for said county, the minimum wage fixed by the state highway commission for such labor, in that the said defendants paid said Jones for fourteen days’ labor, of eight hours each, in August, 1933, the sum of $47.50, whereas the wage fixed by the state highway commission for common labor was 50 cents per hour, or $56 for fourteen days of eight hours each.

Two of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California v. WhitsettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Byars v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. State v. Jay J. Garfield Building Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Ex parte SteinerOregon Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Southwest Engineering Co. v. ErnstArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  2. City of Joplin v. Industrial Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. City of Glendale v. CoquatArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State v. JaastadArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State of Arizona v. MiserArizona Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API