Legal Opinion

Troutner v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1916No. Criminal No. 394PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL.from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. R. C. Stanford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

Appellant was tried and convicted upon an information charging him with the crime of selling, exchanging, giving, bartering and disposing of certain intoxicating liquors. He was tried by a jury and found guilty. From the judgment of conviction he appeals.

The appellant asked the court to instruct the jury as follows

“If you believe from the evidence in this ease, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the drink sold in this case was intoxicating as alleged in the information, but still further believe that at the time defendant sold the same he sold it honestly believing it was not intoxicating, then,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Powell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  3. Commonwealth v. WeissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Morris v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Arizona Mines Supply Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. RussellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  3. Borderland Con. Co. v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State v. SlaytonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. State v. BurrowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API