Legal Opinion

Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, Inc

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided March 11, 2021No. 1:06-cv-00605Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-KMT (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 16-cv-02004-PAB-KMT) Civil Action No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-KMT CROCS, INC., Plaintiff, v. EFFERVESCENT, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 16-cv-02004-PAB-KMT U.S.A. DAWGS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. RONALD SNYDER, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court for the construction of U.S. Patent No. D632,465 (the “’465 Patent” or the “patent”) [Docket No. 548-1]. Crocs, Inc. (“Crocs”) alleges that defendants…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  4. Datamize, L.L.C. v. Plumtree Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API