Legal Opinion
Datamize, L.L.C. v. Plumtree Software, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 5, 2005No. 2004-1564PublishedCited by 218 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Datamize, L.L.C. (“Datamize”) appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California holding each claim of United States Patent No. 6,014,137 (“the 137 patent”) invalid as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2. See Datamize, L.L.C. v. Plumtree Software, Inc., No. 3:02-CV-05693 VRW (N.D.Cal. July 9, 2004). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
A. The 137 Patent and Related Prosecution History
The 137 patent, entitled “Electronic Kiosk Authoring System,” discloses a software program that allows a person to author user interfaces for electronic…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Allen Engineering Corporation v. Bartell Industries, Inc. And Darragh CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Rhodia Chimie & Rhodia, Inc. v. PPG Industries Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by218 opinions
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Ddr Holdings, LLC v. hotels.com, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Sonix Technology Co., Ltd. v. Publications InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Interval Licensing LLC v. Aol, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
213 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.