Legal Opinion
Pruitt v. Pernell
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided January 5, 2005No. 5:02-cv-00270PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOYLE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. In the underlying Complaint, Plaintiff alleges violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and various state law claims. For the reasons outlined below, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Officer Bottoms. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to all other claims against all other Defendants.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff owned and operated Joe Pizza restaurant at 4004 Church Street in Sharpsburg, North Carolina. Plaintiff leased the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Russ v. CauseyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2010
- Murray v. PoaniAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- PETRISOR v. RODGERSDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025