Legal Opinion
Darling v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 16, 2012No. A135747PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEEDHAM, J.
Petitioners seek writ relief from a trial court order staying their construction defect litigation pursuant to Civil Code section 930.1 The court imposed the order because petitioners have not completed the statutory prelitigation procedure of section 910 et seq. Petitioners argued that real parties in interest could not obtain the stay because they had failed to respond to petitioners’ request for documents (§ 912, subd. (a)), while real parties in interest urged—and the trial court found—that no response to the document request was necessary since petitioners had not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Baeza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Pac. & Sw. Annual Conference of United Methodist Church v. Superior Court of San Diego Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Standard Pacific Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
3Cited by3 opinions
- KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- McCaffrey Group, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Blanchette v. Superior Court of Imperial CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017