Legal Opinion

Standard Pacific Corp. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 2009No. E046844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GAUT, J.

INTRODUCTION

Civil Code section 895 et seq. establishes procedures and requirements with respect to construction defect cases involving homes and homeowners. (For convenience, we will sometimes follow the lead of petitioner Standard Pacific Corporation and refer to the statutes as the “Fix-it” law.) Section 910 sets out “prelitigation procedures” to be followed by plaintiffs before suit can be filed, procedures that can be summarized as “notice and opportunity to repair.” Section 912 in turn sets out certain requirements for builders with respect to documentation and information…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Aas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Dennis S.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baeza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. McCaffrey Group, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Darling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Pruchnik v. JCCP4621 Common Benefit Com.California Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API