Legal Opinion

Bruce v. Wallis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 30, 2001No. S01A1699PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunstein, Justice.

Delana Bruce appeals from an order abating a nuisance on her property, challenging the propriety of the relief granted. Finding that the trial court manifestly abused its discretion, we reverse.

1. Ralph Wallis owns property with a pond located on it for raising fish. Wallis’s property is across a county road from Bruce’s farm, where she has trained, bred, and boarded horses for 25 years. Wallis filed a complaint against Bruce to abate a nuisance contending that manure on her property created noxious and offensive odors and that the manure drained into Wallis’s pond and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prime Bank v. GallerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Ebon Foundation, Inc. v. OatmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. Teachers' Retirement System v. ForehandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Dawson v. WadeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bouve & Mohr, LLC v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Bolden v. BartonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  3. DBL, INC. v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Menzies v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  5. Davis v. Vcp South, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API