Legal Opinion
Menzies v. Hall
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 6, 2006No. S06A1167PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNSTEIN, Presiding Justice.
In this equity action, appellant Winston Menzies, d/b/a Cars for Christ (“CFC”), contends that the trial court abused its discretion in fashioning injunctive relief to alleviate excessive rain and surface water run-off from property occupied by CFC onto property owned by appellee Amanda Hall. Because we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.
The evidence presented authorized the trial court to find that Hall is the owner of a 2.5 acre tract of improved real property located in Rockdale County. She has resided on the property since 1943.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Columbia County v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Prime Bank v. GallerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Goode v. Mountain Lake Investments, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Cox v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Gill v. First Christian Church, Atlanta, Georgia, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bailey v. Annistown Road Baptist Church, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Green v. Eastland Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- O'CONNOR v. BielskiSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Danbert v. North Georgia Land Ventures, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Gwinnett County v. McManusSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.