Legal Opinion
Prime Bank v. Galler
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 21, 1993No. S93A0554PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, Chief Justice.
The superior court ordered Prime Bank to demolish a house under construction because the house was being built in violation of procedural requirement contained in a protective covenant. Prime Bank appeals. Appellant urges this Court to reverse the trial court order. We remand the case for further consideration by the trial court to determine if demolishing the house is the least oppressive means of remedying the violation.
*287The appellees purchased a lot in the Amanda Woods subdivision from the developer, Amanda Woods, Inc. Robert Carpenter was the principal shareholder and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cathcart Van & Storage Co. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Jones v. Lanier Development Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Brook Forest Enterprises, Inc. v. Paulding CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Company for Erecting & Supporting a Toll Bridge v. Connecticut River Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
- Dooley v. Savannah Bank Trust CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MabrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Essex Group, Inc. v. Southwire Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Saunders v. Thorn Woode Partnership, L.P.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Jackson v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Kemp v. NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.