Legal Opinion
United States v. Mosquera
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 10, 1993No. 92-1228 (JBW), 93-0036 (JBW)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEINSTEIN, District Judge:
There are eighteen Spanish-speaking defendants in these related complex cases involving narcotics and money-laundering. All require interpreters. Each defendant is represented by a different lawyer. Ten lawyers are privately retained. Eight are assigned pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act (“CJA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3006A. There is good reason to believe that some defendants represented by privately retained attorneys will require CJA attorneys. We can reasonably predict that at least ten separate CJA attorneys will ultimately be appointed in this one…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Fallen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Jessie Oliver and Gregory CooperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Harry William TheriaultCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. MosqueraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- United States v. AguilarDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- People of the Virgin Islands v. Jerris T. Browne, Gregory Christian, and Syed GilaniSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020