Legal Opinion
United States v. Mosquera
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 16, 1993No. CR 92-1228(JBW), CR 93-0036(JBW)PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEINSTEIN, District Judge.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
There are eighteen Spanish-speaking defendants in these related complex cases alleging narcotics and money-laundering offenses. All require interpreters. Each defendant is represented by a different lawyer. Ten lawyers are privately retained. Eight are assigned pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act (“CJA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3006A.
The government’s evidence includes some 10,000 documents. There are also more than 550 tape recordings and transcripts of those tapes obtained through wiretaps. Because of the difficulties in…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- United States v. CelisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- In Re the United States for an Order Authorizing the Use of a Pen Register & a Trap & Trace DeviceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- State v. CalderonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Chinatown Neighborhood Ass'n v. HarrisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.